Ayaw ko sanang laitin ang Pinoy Idol, but now it can be said: one major crippling factor of Pinoy Idol are its non credible judges. Take at look at that video and tell me if it's really that good. Watch that and tell me that the guy didn't have flats and sharps all over the place. I know the song well, so alam kong hindi sa "pagkukulot" ng boses iyon. He just really did not nail some notes: kung baga, hindi umaabot dun sa nota. Flat. It was a horrible performance, but all three seemed to like it. Jolina was on the right track when she said it was "shaky", sana pinanindigan niya na. Ang kaso, binawi niya in the end. Was it because many people clapped for Robby? Pati itong si Ogie, akala ko pa naman sasabihin niya na maraming alanganing nota, pero wala. I do recognize that the guy has had consistently good, solid performances in the past, and that he has a lot of fans, but for that day he did not do well at all. The judges are there to critique and not just pander. Nasaan na ang standards ng judges?
Then, there were Jolina Magdangal's comments for that night. She has to be more precise in critiquing. Hindi yung puro "winner" ang sinasabi niya. Hindi ko tuloy maiwasang ikumpara ang mga komento ng judges dito sa mga komento ng judges sa Pinoy Dream Academy. I have been an Idol viewer even since its ABC5 inception. I didn't even watch the first season of Pinoy Dream Academy because I had the impression that it was tacky. But, in all honesty, I just really got bored with Pinoy Idol this time around so I watched PDA. I was amazed with the perception of the judges there and the precise nature of their comments. (napuna nila yung mga gestures and little tics ng singer, mula hand gestures, down to finger tapping, pati paraan ng pagbitaw ng end notes ng performer napansin nila)
Sa hula ko, meron silang mga guide questions or at least guidelines in giving comments, kaya naging napaka precise ng pagkokomento nila. (Speculation ko lang- para kasing may sheets of paper sila sa harap nila. And for all we know, may mga keywords dun on what to look for in a performance). Whether aided with guide questions, keywords, or completely spontaneous: the fact remains that the PDA judges gave spot on, constructive and enlightening critiques. Baka dapat magkaroon din ng guidelines ang judges ng Idol para naman may masabi na silang matino at mas constructive- especially Jolina, and even sometimes Wyngard (his comments about the contestants' clothes and appearance are getting tired, repetitive, and annoying).
Isa pang annoying- yung mga mannerism ng performers habang ine-engganyo ni Raymond G na iboto sila. Yung isa nag-motion na parang nagtetext sabay mouthing off ng "Please vote me". Yung isa naman nagmotion na parang magdadasal tapos nagpakita ng pitiful face. Di ba nila alam na hindi sila nakakatuwa, instead nakaka turnoff pa? Maybe someone ought to tell them that. Don't these people have handlers.
As for the performers, we can't even judge how talented they are because they haven't been challenged enough by the show's format/themes. The themes are too general, that it allows the contestants to choose songs that are still in their comfort levels. No wonder the judges can't say anything new, because they can't see anything new. Pare pareho ang mga kinakanta ng contestants. Pati estilo nila hindi nagbabago, hindi gumaganda, hindi nag-e-evolve: stagnant. Many of them have not gone out of their comfort zones at all, they are just cruising along ang hoping to make it to the next performance night. No one stands out, no one feels like an idol!
Most of the top 12 performances sounded like band covers and bad bar/lounge acts. Iilan yung may sariling estilo. Tapos ni hindi pa binigyan ng magandang arrangement yung mga kanta. Basta nalang inihain duon, yung iba nagumpisa sa "peak" ng song, walang buildup so paano makikita ang dynamics ng boses ng performer? To top it off ang iksi ng time per contestant (only one minute to interpret a song?!! aba, bumubuwelo ka pa lang ay tapos ka na!), ano ito---for more commercials? Kahit sa American Idol mas mahaba yung time alloted for performances.
In contrast, the opening production number was too lengthy. Newsflash: This is not SOP! Buti sana kung grand finals na ito, pero Top 12 pa lang. Sana binigyan na lang nila kahit 30 seconds more each performer para mas nakilatis ang strengths and weaknesses per singer, instead of doing an overly long opening act. And what were all those dancers doing crowding the stage like that? Pangit tingnan, walang ka-class class. Pinagmukha nilang maliit yung stage ulit, sayang nagmukha na ngang mas grand nung si Raymond pa lang ang nakatayo.
Part of what makes Idol performances interesting is that the performers make songs their own, sing it in their style, and even with a special arrangement that suits this style. Nagtipid ba ang GMA sa arranger ng mga songs? wala ba silang vocal coaches, performance teachers para magpayo sa mga performers that they should showcase their vocal strengths and not just ape the original singers of the songs?
It was a generally lacklustre, disappointing night. Sana sa susunod mag-improve na ang themes, ang judges, at ang mga performers. Ipakita naman nilang Pinoy Idol ito at hindi pipitsuging contest sa tabi tabi.
(credits to mukamo.com for the video)
Labels: gma, gma7, jolina magdangal, judges, ogie alcasid, pinoy idol, robby navarro, wyngard tracy



